Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Fearnley

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 01:59, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Fearnley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable artist, sources I find are largely auction sales or listings. No other sourcing found. Oaktree b (talk) 16:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Found a source in a car magazine artist Alan Fearnley describes in detail. Automobile quarterly by Princeton Institute for Historic Research.

End quote:

Despite the fact that this book is expensive for its size, it nevertheless serves to highlight and celebrate the work of one of Britain's finest masters. Artists are railroad workers whose work must be universally recognized.

--Товболатов (talk) 19:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:28, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In reference to various additional occupation-specific criteria, such as WP:ARTIST, the policy also states, "Failure to meet these criteria is not conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included. A person who does not meet these additional criteria may still be notable under Wikipedia:Notability."
Thus, even if the subject does not the meet WP:ARTIST standards, this alone is not valid reason for deletion, if WP:NBASIC is still met. I believe it is, as significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources exists. Here is a source assessment table:
Source assessment table: prepared by User:IAmHuitzilopochtli
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Automobile quarterly Yes Story is written by an independent entity. Yes Source appears to be an authoritative source with standards. Yes An entire article is focused on the subject. Yes
National Railway Bulletin Yes Written by a third-party. Yes NRHS is reliable. Yes An entire chapter/section is dedicated to Alan Fearnley. Yes
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
IAmHuitzilopochtli (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.